Tx Power Control for Reliable Bluetooth Communication

A new paper investigates how transmission power can be adaptively controlled in Bluetooth Low Energy communications to improve reliability while reducing energy consumption in dynamic Internet of Things environments. It focuses on the complex relationship between received signal strength, data throughput, transmission power and overall system power consumption, all of which are strongly influenced by environmental variability such as interference, distance and multipath effects.


The authors first provide an extensive experimental analysis using Nordic BLE hardware to characterise how changes in transmission power affect signal strength, throughput and energy use across clean, moderately complex and highly noisy environments. The results show that increasing transmission power generally improves both RSSI and throughput, but at a significant energy cost, particularly when a front-end power amplifier is used. They also demonstrate that RSSI can be measured reliably at high update rates, whereas throughput measurements become increasingly noisy at high calculation frequencies due to the packet-based nature of BLE.

Building on these observations, the paper proposes a closed-loop transmission power control framework based on proportional–integral–derivative controllers implemented on the central device. Three strategies are developed and evaluated. The RSSI-based controller responds quickly to signal fluctuations and works well in clean or fast-changing environments, but it does not directly guarantee a desired data rate. The throughput-based controller directly targets application-level performance and performs better in complex environments, but its slower response and higher variability make it vulnerable to sudden disturbances.


To overcome the limitations of both approaches, the authors introduce a hybrid dual-loop controller that combines throughput-based control with fast RSSI regulation. In this design, the throughput loop sets an appropriate RSSI target, while a faster RSSI loop adjusts transmission power to maintain that target. Experimental results show that this hybrid method achieves more stable throughput with lower variance, maintains connectivity during abrupt signal degradation and delivers substantial energy savings compared with fixed maximum transmission power.

The study concludes that closed-loop, PID-based transmission power control is an effective way to balance reliability and energy efficiency in BLE systems. Among the evaluated strategies, the hybrid RSSI–throughput approach provides the best overall performance in dynamic and complex environments. Future work is proposed on extending the framework to multi-node and mesh networks and on using adaptive or learning-based techniques to further improve controller performance under mobility and varying traffic conditions.

New Bluetooth Low Energy Error Correction Using AI

A new paper Error Correction in Bluetooth Low Energy via Neural Network with Reject Option by Almeida et al. (2025) presents a new method for improving data reliability in Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) communication without modifying the transmitter. The technique combines cyclic redundancy check (CRC) error detection with a neural network that has a reject option, allowing it to identify and correct bit errors more effectively.

The study explains how BLE devices, particularly in Internet of Things (IoT) applications, suffer from data corruption due to multipath fading and interference. Traditional error-correcting codes, such as Turbo or LDPC, are unsuitable for BLE because of their computational and memory demands. Instead, the authors propose an Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) neural network that detects uncertain bits using a reject output (labelled R) and then flips them for CRC revalidation, iterating until the packet is corrected.


Simulations using Rayleigh fading and additive white Gaussian noise channels showed that the method achieved correction rates between 94–98% for single-bit errors and 54–68% for double-bit errors, depending on packet size. It significantly lowered packet error rates and improved throughput compared with uncorrected transmission.

When applied to compressed grayscale image transmission, the method restored visual quality under noisy conditions (signal-to-noise ratios of 9–11 dB). Measured using Structural Similarity Index (SSIM) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), image quality improved markedly, often recovering most of the lost detail.

The approach outperformed other CRC-based correction algorithms such as CRC-ADMM and CRC-BP while requiring less computational power and memory. Processing times were substantially lower, enabling near real-time correction suitable for BLE and IoT devices.

The proposed neural network with reject option offers an efficient, scalable, and energy-aware method for enhancing BLE reliability without additional transmitter complexity. It reduces retransmissions, improves data integrity, and enhances performance in both data and multimedia transmission scenarios.

Can Beacons Be Used on Aircraft?

We have had enquiries whether beacons can be used on aircraft. While there’s no specific guidance on beacons from aviation authorities, beacons transmit the same radio signals to other Bluetooth devices such as the FitBit, Android Wear, Apple Watch and Bluetooth headphones. These devices are classed as Personal Electronic Devices (PED).

The use of PEDs depends on the airline. Both the FAA and EASA have guidelines for the use of PEDs. Smart Luggage is No Longer Allowed.

Bluetooth Low Energy Choices

There is new research (PDF) analysing methods for indoor distance estimation using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), with an emphasis on practical implementation in embedded systems. It compares four main techniques, Received Signal Strength Indication (RSSI), Time of Flight (ToF), Angle of Arrival (AoA), and Channel Sounding (CS), examining their theory, hardware and software requirements, and performance. The work aims to guide designers in selecting the most appropriate method based on accuracy, power consumption, complexity and cost.

The study explains foundational localisation concepts such as trilateration, precision, accuracy, and resolution, and then explores range-based and range-free distance estimation methods. It provides a detailed breakdown of BLE architecture, including host and controller components, communication protocols, and physical layer considerations, linking these to the requirements of the four techniques.


RSSI and ToF were tested experimentally on NXP’s MCX W71x platform, showing RSSI’s simplicity but high environmental sensitivity, and ToF’s better short-range consistency but increased instability and power usage over distance. Direct testing of AoA and CS was not possible due to hardware constraints, so the analysis relies on third-party demonstrations, confirming AoA’s potential for precise angular measurement and CS’s sub-metre accuracy and robustness in complex environments.

The final comparison uses criteria such as accuracy, robustness, processing complexity, and hardware needs to recommend different methods for applications like smart buildings, asset tracking, and IoT systems. The study concludes by bridging the gap between theory and embedded implementation, offering a reference framework for future BLE-based localisation developments.

Bluetooth in the IoT Ecosystem

The great new paper titled Evolution of Bluetooth Technology: BLE in the IoT Ecosystem provides a comprehensive review of Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE), tracing its development from its origins to its role in the modern Internet of Things (IoT). The authors outline the historical evolution of Bluetooth, starting with its initial release in the late 1990s through to the latest version, Bluetooth 6.0, introduced in 2024.

BLE, introduced in Bluetooth 4.0 in 2010, was designed as a low-power alternative to Bluetooth Classic, making it ideal for IoT applications where energy efficiency is critical. The paper discusses BLE’s technical characteristics, such as its reduced power consumption, moderate data rates, mesh networking support, and robust security features and highlights the differences from Bluetooth Classic.

The review details the progression of BLE through its successive versions, each introducing improvements in range, throughput, latency, and security. It also explores the integration of BLE in various IoT contexts, including smart homes, healthcare, automotive, retail, industrial automation, and smart cities. Several case studies are used to illustrate real-world BLE implementations, demonstrating its utility across multiple sectors.

The paper considers BLE’s alignment with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly in promoting energy efficiency, sustainable urban development, and climate action. BLE’s role in enabling sustainable technologies, such as solar-powered IoT devices and low-power smart infrastructure, is also discussed.

Finally, the article reviews current technical challenges, such as power management, interference, scalability and security. It proposes potential solutions and anticipates future directions involving BLE’s integration with artificial intelligence, enhanced privacy protocols and expanded functionality in next-generation IoT ecosystems.

Passive Indoor People Counting Using Bluetooth LE

The new paper Passive Indoor People Counting by Bluetooth Signal Deformation Analysis with Deep Learning, proposes a method for counting people in indoor spaces using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) signals and deep learning techniques. The goal is to offer a privacy-preserving, device-free, and non-intrusive solution for occupancy monitoring in environments where camera use is inappropriate, such as hospitals and laboratories.

The method relies on analysing how human presence distorts BLE signals, particularly their Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI). Unlike traditional camera-based or wearable solutions, this approach does not require people to carry any devices. BLE beacons emit signals that, when passing through or reflecting off human bodies, become altered in predictable ways. These signal deformations are then analysed using deep neural networks to estimate the number of occupants.

Five deep learning models were evaluated: Dense Neural Network (DenseNN), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), a hybrid CNN+LSTM model, and a Transformer-based model. Both classification and regression approaches were tested. The hybrid CNN+LSTM model consistently outperformed the others in terms of accuracy and mean absolute error.

A key strength of the method is its flexibility and efficiency in new environments. The model is pre-trained on a large, varied dataset, and only requires a brief fine-tuning session with a small sample of data from the new location. In some cases, the model could even interpolate occupancy values it was not explicitly trained on. This means that with minimal setup time, the system can be deployed effectively in a range of environments, achieving accuracies of over 96%, and in some configurations even exceeding 99%.

The authors also developed a comprehensive data preprocessing and filtering strategy to account for signal noise and variability caused by human movement and the BLE protocol’s frequency hopping. They configured BLE beacons to transmit on fixed channels to maintain consistency in RSSI measurements.

In conclusion, the proposed BLE-based passive people counting system demonstrates high adaptability, accuracy, and practicality for real-time occupancy monitoring, with notable advantages over existing BLE and even some WiFi-based solutions. However, it still requires some calibration in each new environment due to limitations in generalising across different room geometries. Future work aims to develop a model that can generalise without this fine-tuning step.

New BluetoothLEView by NirSoft

NirSoft has released a new application for Windows called BluetoothLEView. This lightweight tool is a standalone .exe file that does not require installation, making it easy to use on Windows 10 and Windows 11.

BluetoothLEView detects and monitors nearby Bluetooth Low Energy (LE) devices, including beacons. It displays detailed information such as the device’s MAC Address, Name, Signal Strength in dBm (RSSI), Manufacturer ID, Manufacturer Name, Service UUID, first and last detection times, the number of times the device has been detected and more.

To use BluetoothLEView, your PC or laptop must have an internal Bluetooth adapter that supports Bluetooth LE. You can check if your system is compatible by opening Device Manager, selecting Bluetooth, and looking for “Microsoft Bluetooth LE Enumerator” in the list of devices.

If your computer does not have an internal adapter, you can plug in an inexpensive USB Bluetooth adapter that supports Bluetooth Low Energy.

Does Bluetooth LE Work the Same Way in all Countries?

Bluetooth technology operates on a global scale using the 2.4 GHz ISM band, allowing devices to be used internationally without specific adaptations for local radio spectrum regulations. The Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG) ensures that all devices meet international standards for compatibility and interoperability.

However, there are certain regulatory considerations that vary by country. Some nations require Bluetooth devices to undergo type approval, for example CE (for Europe) or FCC (for USA), to ensure they adhere to local standards. Additionally, power output limitations for Bluetooth devices can differ from one country to another. For example, Australia permits a maximum of 200 mW e.i.r.p. within a specific frequency range, while most European countries adhere to standard ISM band regulations.

Do Bluetooth Beacons Need a Licence to Use?

Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) technology does not require a licence for use, making it a popular choice for various devices including smartwatches, fitness trackers, laptops, PCs, smartphones and industrial equipment.

BLE operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM (Industrial Scientific Medical) band, which is licence-free in most countries. This means that anyone can use this frequency range without obtaining a specific permit which has contributed to the widespread adoption of BLE technology. BLE is an open standard managed by the Bluetooth Special Interest Group (SIG), which allows for broad implementation across various devices.

Bluetooth vs WiFi Range

When it comes to wireless connectivity, Bluetooth and WiFi are two of the most widely used technologies. While they serve different purposes, they share some similarities in terms of range and frequency usage. Typically, Bluetooth has similar range as WiFi. Standard Bluetooth connections and WiFi can reach up to 50 meters depending on reflection and blocking.

While standard Bluetooth and WiFi devices have limited ranges, there are special Bluetooth beacons designed for extended range capabilities. These beacons can achieve ranges that surpass typical WiFi connections, sometimes reaching up to 4Km. This extended range is achieved through the use of higher power outputs and additional signal amplifiers. However, it’s important to note that the more extreme long-range beacons are specialised devices requiring power via USB rather than battery and are not representative of typical Bluetooth functionality.

Bluetooth 5 brought significant improvements to the technology, including the potential for extended range. Theoretically, Bluetooth 5 can achieve ranges up to four times that of previous versions in ideal conditions. However, it’s important to understand that most Bluetooth beacons, even those supporting Bluetooth 5, don’t usually utilise these extended range capabilities. This limitation is primarily due to compatibility issues with smartphones.

Most smartphones on the market today don’t support the long-range features of Bluetooth 5. As a result, beacon manufacturers often choose not to implement these extended range capabilities to ensure their devices remain compatible with the widest range of smartphones possible. This decision prioritises broad compatibility over the potential for increased range.